Which statement about balance in layout is true?

The statement that asymmetric layouts are more eye-catching reflects the design principle that visual interest can be generated through imbalance. Asymmetry can draw the viewer's attention more effectively because it creates a more dynamic and engaging composition. Unlike symmetric layouts, which often lend a sense of stability and predictability, asymmetric layouts introduce contrast and movement by placing elements unevenly across the design. This can enhance the overall aesthetic and capture the viewer's gaze, making the design more memorable.

The idea that symmetric layouts are always more effective does not take into account the context of the design or the message being conveyed. While symmetry can provide harmony, it is not a one-size-fits-all solution in graphic communication. Similarly, asserting that only dominant elements can establish balance overlooks the fact that balance can be achieved through various visual relationships, including those among all elements, regardless of their size or prominence. Moreover, the belief that balance is not important in design contradicts fundamental design principles, as achieving balance is essential for creating compositions that are visually appealing and easy to navigate.